Telcos propose reforming USF to subsidize legacy DSL

A half dozen first and second tier telcos including America's largest, AT&T and Verizon, are proposing to replace the existing Universal Service Fund that subsidizes switched voice service with two new subsidy programs to provide Internet connectivity in high cost areas. The proposal was made in a July 29 filing with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.

One program would support wireline service, the Connect America Fund (CAF). The other, the Advanced Mobility/Satellite Fund, would subsidize wireless and satellite service in the least populated, highest cost areas of the nation. The CAF subsidy would be highly granular -- down to the census block level served by an existing telco central office.

The CAF is aimed at subsidizing buildout of the telcos' legacy Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service using fiber to feed remote DSLAMs that serve premises using the existing copper cable plant. The CAF plan proposes approximating the FCC's current asynchronous minimum definition of broadband, 4 Mbs for the download side of the connection and 1 Mbs for uploads. (The CAF proposal calls for an upload speed of 768 Kbs)

The filing comes just one week after AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson declared DSL obsolete technology. Apparently it's not for those parts of AT&T's service area where the company has opted not to invest in building out its VDSL-based U-Verse service. For those areas, legacy ADSL that offered throughput at the current FCC minimum that was state of the art technology a decade ago will have to suffice.

If these telcos had been smart and exercised even a slight degree of foresight, they would have made this proposal in the late 1990s when they first began to roll out DSL service. Or by 2000 at the latest. At that time, they clearly knew a business case couldn't be made to deploy DSL in large swaths of their service territories without some form of subsidization.

This proposal is not only tardy by a decade or more. It sets the throughput bar too low by fixing it on today's current minimum definition of broadband. With Internet bandwidth demand growing at a rapid pace to support increasingly bandwidth hungry applications -- most notably video -- today's 4 Mbs down and 1 Mbs up standard is by definition the edge of tomorrow's obsolescence. Some would argue it's already obsolete.

The incumbent telcos' proposal also comes as community broadband projects are taking off and building out in many parts of the nation that provide far faster, future proof Internet connectivity using fiber to the premise connections.

Telcos cynically cite demographic data to justify failure to invest in broadband infrastructure

Here's some typical telco funded propaganda on broadband. It's designed to shift and downplay the focus away from the lack of broadband availability due to inadequate telco infrastructure to broadband adoption rates. Once that's accomplished, it's time to play the socioeconomic card and decry low computer literacy among certain demographic groups.

Bottom line, the telcos are looking to justify their failure to upgrade their plants over the last mile to support broadband by blaming poor, older and less educated people who say they don't use computers and don't need broadband. In other words, we don't need to deploy broadband because you're simply too ignorant to use it even if we did.

Telco market segmentation has shrunk U.S. residential wireline service area map, setting stage for locals to take over last mile

The widespread prevalence of broadband black holes throughout the United States — which can be found in urban, suburban, semi-rural and rural areas — has brought to light a major change in the landscape of residential telecommunications service. In modern times, residential telecommunications has meant near universal service to all but the most remote areas.

With the advent of high speed Internet, the residential wireline market is no longer a single one but has been segmented by the telcos who maintain monopolistic control over their markets. Over the past 2-3 years, the boundaries of broadband black holes have hardened and delineate the two segments.

The more accurate description is the residential market hasn’t been so much segmented but rather shrunk. One only need compare the telcos’ maps of where they provide Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) and areas where advanced Internet protocol-based services are offered to graphically see the shrinkage.

This is a permanent alteration of America’s telecommunications map. Despite telcos’ promises to “turn up” advanced services to these areas over the past decade, it’s now apparent that these statements are a time buying PR ploy to keep regulators and politicians at bay. Now the residential wireline telecommunications map is posed to shrink even further with the limited rollout of fiber to the home service by Verizon and AT&T’s technologically constrained deployment of its fiber to the node Project Lightspeed as both companies migrate from DSL.

This redrawing of America’s telecommunications map has major implications for so-called “last mile” residential wireline. Where they don’t provide last mile IP-based access, the telcos will instead serve as first and middle mile telecom providers. Small local telcos and the residents themselves will become the default last mile providers. Where it makes business sense, smaller telcos that specialize in serving communities will deploy fiber to the node and fiber to the home. Where the numbers don’t pencil out for the small telcos, the residents will deploy their own fiber and fund it though voluntary cooperatives and special taxing districts.

Over the next several years, fiber will come to be viewed as a utility not unlike electric power and water and will appear on residential MLS real estate listings. Properties that lack fiber optic access will be at a distinct disadvantage to those that have fiber, creating a strong incentive for property owners to work together to bring fiber to their neighborhoods to better capitalize on recovering real estate values following the current market downturn.

Silicon Valley businesses meet on broadband infrastructure needs

Leaders of high tech Silicon Valley companies are growing concerned that the telco/cable duopoly is failing to keep up with their growing Internet bandwidth needs:

These company and city leaders will discuss how to overcome current regional challenges to building a telecommunications system worthy of the region many consider the technology capital of the world. The meeting will be guided by a keynote presentation by Scott McNealy, Chairman and Co-Founder of Sun Microsystems, plus a report by the Bay Area Council, prepared by Bonocore Technology Partners, that reviews what other countries or regions have done to improve their infrastructure, and recommends Bay Area actions.

Analyst: Telcos no threat to cable

Sanford Bernstein Senior Analyst Craig Moffett opines that cable companies face no near term threat from telcos. Moffett is particularly dismissive of AT&T, which he sees unable to match broadband throughput speeds provided by cable companies and unlikely close the gap. Moffett also echos my own observation earlier this year that customers will find DSL increasingly inadequate as they download higher amounts of video content:

But while AT&T may upgrade 40 percent of its DSL plant to fiber in order to bring faster high-speed data service to its customers, some 60 percent of its network won’t be upgraded, Moffett projects. That means that AT&T will still be competing at a maximum standard DSL bit rate of 768 Kbps while cable operators offer substantially higher bit-rates, a disparity that could become more of a competitive challenge for AT&T as consumers download more video online through services like YouTube.

Inadequate telco infrastructure drives cities to build fiber networks

Lafayette's Fiber to the Home project is expected to provide residents and businesses with Internet, cable and telephone services at a low cost.

Salter said cities with fiber networks have experienced economic growth as a result.

"We just think that the ability to move information is where everything is going," he said.

Huval said telecommunications companies have infrastructure with limited capacity.

Fiber will not artificially limit capacity, he said. Residents will be able to choose how they want their fiber.