When AT&T began the regulatory review process of its
planned acquisition of DirecTV one year ago, it proposed to offer fixed
wireless Internet service to about 13 million residential premises in its
service territory not offered Internet service in order to improve the deal’s odds
of gaining approval. These premises were never offered AT&T’s legacy ADSL
service after it was introduced more than a decade ago. And even if they were
today, ADSL would fall far short the Federal Communications Commission’s speed-based
minimum standard for Internet service of 25 Mbps for downloads and 3 Mbps up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0548/e05483837e3723db80488a36d78bb8ad97523427" alt="Image result for at7t"
Now that the FCC’s rules deeming Internet a common carrier
telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act are going
into effect requiring Internet service providers to “furnish such communication
service upon reasonable request” under Title II’s universal service and
nondiscrimination provisions, AT&T may be seeking another, more important
role for its planned “wireless local loop” fixed wireless plant.
Specifically, helping it meet its universal service
obligations. With so many premises in its service territory refused Internet
service for a decade or longer, AT&T could face a potential barrage of
complaints and penalties if these premises remain without premises Internet
service and it continues to say no to service requests.
However, as
arstechnica reports today, AT&T’s
fixed wireless service is expected to provide connectivity of up to 20 Mbps
– below the FCC’s minimum standard for Internet service. The only way to get
more wireless bandwidth is more fiber backhaul bandwidth and/or more wireless
transmitters. That means AT&T would likely have to spend more than it would
like on its planned “wireless local loop” plant to bring service up to the FCC’s
standard in order to keep itself out of hot water with regulators.
No comments:
Post a Comment